Cancer Tutor Forum Primary Natural Cancer Treatments Statistics on Various treatments.

This topic contains 1 reply, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Dave 1 week ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #94791

    Dave

    Hello,
    Does anyone know where some results have been published on different alternative treatments for cancer?

    It is very easy to say chemo and radiation don't work due to the statistics they publish. But for alternatives I haven't found any numbers or percentages other than to be given examples of people but you can find them for chemo survivors also.

    Unless it is a large sample size and to get survival rates over time how can anyone have a realistic picture of alternative methods and their success rates?

    Thanks
    Dave

    #94982

    Dave

    Hello,

    I've been doing a little more looking into the numbers, the ebook published here introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments states that baseed on Dr Ralph Moss's book Questioning Chemotherapy that the survival rate is 3%. I've bought this book but haven't read it yet. But reading his editorial review he is saying the government figures of survival rates that for US are 67% and Australia 68% for living past 5 years are not really that but they are the response rates to the cancer tumor?

    Is this how everyone else reads this?

    The websites do not saying anything about response rates and no footnotes I can find about it? Does anyone know where these footnotes would be located if they exist?

    US gov website.

    https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/results_merged/topic_survival.pdf

    Aus gov website

    https://canceraustralia.gov.au/affected-cancer/what-cancer/cancer-australia-statistics

    There is a pretty big difference between 3% and 67%, can someone explain this with some numbers please and sources as I'm starting to doubt there is such a big difference in them unless there is some explanation and proof?

    With those latest stats of 67% for conventional versus 80 – 90% for alternative survival rates this does appear to not that bit a gap. Granted I still choose alternative for better odds, makes more sense, better treatment of what is does to the body.

    I do take exception though in being given incorrect figures as this then implies an agenda and you have to discover the agenda to discover the more accurate truth. On both sides of the fence. Still researching at the moment before I fully decide on treatment I choose. I do take exception though in being given incorrect figures as this then implies an agenda and you have to discover the agenda to discover the more accurate truth. On both sides of the fence. Still researching at the moment before I fully decide on treatment I choose. v

    Thanks
    Dave

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.