The Purpose of the    www.CancerTutor.com    Website

The purpose of this website is to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information on alternative cancer treatments known to the webmaster. The purpose of this information is to let cancer patients and/or their caregivers have the information necessary to let them know what alternative cancer treatment options exist.

In short, the purpose of this website is to save cancer patients, or their caregivers, several years of research time. When a person has cancer they usually do not have several years to research their options. Even if they did, it would take time to become proficient at researching the internet.

The vast majority of cancer patients who seek out alternative cancer treatments, and thus who visit this website, have had extensive orthodox cancer treatments, and many of them have been "sent home to die."

Many of these patients have already given orthodox medicine an opportunity to cure their cancer, but orthodox medicine has exhausted their abilities and the patient has been left to their own devices. Many of these patients only have a short time to live and need critical and accurate information in a very short amount of time.

Thus the purpose of this site is to let cancer patients:

1) Quickly learn about their alternative cancer treatment options, so they can
2) Make their cancer treatment decisions more quickly, and thus they can
3) Start their alternative cancer treatment sooner then they could by doing their own research!!!

Nothing is sold from this website and every attempt is made to make statements which are unbiased and are solely in the best interest of the cancer patient.

About the Author - R. Webster Kehr

This website is owned, operated and written by R. Webster Kehr, a bona fide cancer researcher. Mr. Kehr has developed the following cancer treatments and made the following discoveries:

1) His model of how cancer forms at the cellular level is the most accurate model in history. Ron Gdanski, Dr. Alan Cantwell, Dr. Virginia Livingston, and others have done critical work in developing the individual pieces. Webster Kehr put all the pieces together, coupled with an understanding of mitochondria, and came up with a comprehensive model. An understanding of this model, and an understanding of the pleomorphic nature of microbes, is critical to an understanding of how to cure cancer. See:
The Theory of Cancer

2) He is the "father" of the concept of an "Overnight Cure For Cancer," whereby every cancer cell in a person's body can be reverted into a normal cell within 24 hours. This is a potential reality if a person understands what really causes cancer. In the 1930s, researcher Dr. Royal Rife cured cancer within minutes because he understood exactly what causes cancer. The American Medical Association offered many times to buy his technology (no doubt with the intent to "bury" the technology), but Dr. Rife refused to "sell-out." The FDA then stepped in and destroyed his equipment. The point is that that cancer can be cured very quickly if a person knows what causes cancer.

3) He figured out how melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma spread. At one time there was only one treatment for these two types of cancer, but now there are several very good cures for melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

4) He perfected and has pushed the concept of using chlorine dioxide transdermally (i.e. through the skin, using DMSO). This allows patients of cancer, Lymes Disease, AIDS, etc. to avoid having to waste a lot of time building up to a therapeutic dose. Many patients can never build up to a therapeutic dose. By using transdermal applications, patients can achieve a therapeutic dose on the first day of treatment. His experience with early "Overnight Cure For Cancer" treatments had taught him the technology to do this.

5) He developed the still experimental Brandt Grape Cure using Noni Juice and/or Mangosteen juice and/or Wolfberry juice (i.e. Goji juice) instead of grapes,

6) He has developed numerous modifications/improvements to alternative cancer treatments developed by others (which improvements are based on his understanding of how to avoid weaknesses in a treatment),

7) His Stage IV article is simply the best article on the Internet on the overall treatment of advanced cancer. See:
Treatment For Stage IV Patients

8) He has developed numerous ways to combine, and make synergistic, two or more alternative cancer treatments, again based on his understanding of cancer.

At any given time, Mr. Kehr is researching several cancer treatments still under development. His research is state-of-the-art and is based on a clear understanding of how cancer forms.

He is the President and a member of the Board of Directors of the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc., a non-profit corporation organized in the state of Nevada.

Any statement or comment on this website, or in emails sent from Mr. Kehr, represent his opinion as a cancer research and should not be interpreted as medical advice from a medical practitioner.

A Discussion Of The Use of the Term "Cure,"
by R. Webster Kehr

Because this website uses the term "cure" many times, it is necessary to delineate what this website means when it uses the term "cure."

If the average "man on the street" were asked what it meant to "cure cancer," he or she would no doubt say that a cancer patient was "cured" if their cancer was gone and they were no longer using any prescription drugs.

This website uses what might be called the "alternative medicine" definition of "cure":

• "A person is 'cured' of their cancer if the number of cancer cells in their body is less than, or equal to, the number of cancer cells in the average person. It is also hoped that their immune system is able to kill newly developing cancer cells (every person has newly developing cancer cells)."

The definition of "cure" that orthodox medicine uses is this: A cancer patient is "cured" if they live 5 years from the date of their diagnosis of cancer.

This definition of "cure" ignores the physical condition of the patient, it ignores how many cancer cells they have, and it ignores how long they are expected to live after the 5 year mark. For example, if they die 5 years and 2 days after they were first diagnosed, they are counted as a "cured" cancer patient.

Why does orthodox medicine use a definition of "cure" which is so vastly different than what the "man on the street" would use?

The reason is that orthodox medicine has no interest in "curing" cancer the way the "man on the street" wants cancer to be cured. Their definition is designed to make orthodox medicine look good if they are able to convert cancer into a chronic disease.

Alternative Cancer Treatments

Alternative cancer treatments can actually have one of three different outcomes:

First, are those whose cancer is gone and who never get cancer again because their cancer cells have been killed, or reverted into normal cells, and their immune system has been built up and their lifestyle has changed.

Second, are those who have the vast majority of their cancer cells killed or reverted into normal cells, but for one of many different reasons, such as going back to their old lifestyle, the cancer does return. In this case, there is a high probability that they will know what to do the second time around.

Third, are those who do not survive their cancer. This can happen because the wrong treatment was chosen or prior orthodox cancer treatments did irreversible damage. In any case, it is almost certain that the alternative cancer treatments improved and extended their life far beyond what orthodox medicine could have done.

Alternative cancer treatments would have a much higher true "cure rate" if all cancer patients used alternative cancer treatments exclusively as soon as they were diagnosed. In other words, the true "cure rate" of alternative cancer treatments is severely hampered because alternative medicine has lost many months (or years) of treatment time before most cancer patients start their alternative cancer treatment.

Orthodox Cancer Treatments

Orthodox medicine has had many opportunities to establish treatments that cured cancer (using the alternative medicine definition of "cure"). In every case they have rejected such treatments in favor of far more profitable treatments.

With very rare exceptions, orthodox medicine has designed their treatments to make cancer into a chronic, highly profitable disease. Their intentional failure to cure cancer in the past can be expected to continue well into the future. Their search for more profitable treatments will continue until they are forced by public outcry to use treatments that cure cancer the way many alternative cancer treatments cure cancer (e.g. medical doctors would use natural substances).

This is why orthodox medicine does not like it when alternative medicine uses the term "cure." If you wish to use the orthodox definition of "cure" as you read this website, and you do not like the alternative medicine definition of "cure," then as you read the articles on this website, simply substitute any use of the term "cure" with the term "treatment" or "spontaneous remission."

Furthermore, orthodox medicine does not like people to know of their alternative cancer treatment options. Thus, it can be stated that orthodox medicine does not like websites that tell people about their alternative cancer treatment options.

More Information

If you would like more information about the comparison of alternative cancer treatments versus orthodox cancer treatments, see the following article:
Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments

FDA Required Disclaimer For Sites That Do Not Endorse Chemotherapy:

• This web site is for educational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment and advice of a qualified licensed professional. This site offers people medical information and tells them their alternative medical options, but in no way should anyone consider that this site represents the "practice of medicine." This site assumes no responsibility for how this material is used. Also note that this website frequently updates its contents, due to a variety of reasons, therefore, some information may be out of date. The statements regarding alternative treatments for cancer have not been evaluated by the FDA.